The Supreme Court has upheld a murder conviction. In Wood v. Allen, the Court held that it was not ineffective for trial attorneys to ignore a possible defense of cognitive deficiencies when the attorneys were in possession of a report that cast doubt as to whether such deficiencies actually limited the Defendant's functioning.
In so ruling, the Court stressed that an ineffective assistance claim cannot prevail when a trial attorney is employing reasonable strategy. Given that such has been the law for years, it is surprising that the Court would take up this issue; the Court likely only took this issue as the Circuit Court of Appeals had reversed the District Court's upholding of the conviction.
Justices Stevens and Kennedy were the only dissenters.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment